Pfizer deal was an insurance policy we needed but it was too little too late
Australians needed an insurance policy when Scott Morrison and Greg Hunt struck a deal with AstraZeneca in August last year to get some of the first vaccines against COVID-19.
But the insurance policy was too late and too small. It took months for the Prime Minister and Health Minister to commit to a similar deal with Pfizer, whose vaccine turned out to be one of the best.
Scott Morrison received his second Pfizer dose in March, but could it have been earlier if the government had done a deal sooner? Credit:Edwina Pickles
The government needed more options to cover itself if one of the vaccines fell over. The documents revealed this week show it was too slow to commit to Pfizer at the very time it hailed its alliance with AstraZeneca.
Australia was badly late when it announced a deal with Pfizer in November last year for 10 million doses. The United Kingdom had a deal on July 20, the US on July 22 and Japan on July 31.
The new documents, released under Freedom of Information law, show a lack of urgency in the governmentâs response to Pfizerâs overtures. The company wrote to Hunt on June 30 to say it wanted to work with the government âas quickly as we canâ to deliver millions of doses.
It took until October for Hunt to meet anyone from the company face-to-face, just before the November 5 agreement. He had written to the company on May 10 but left the negotiations to his department. He and Morrison appeared to rely on scientists and officials to choose the best vaccines and get the deals done.
Other leaders were more aggressive. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu famously called Pfizer chief Albert Bourla 30 times to get supplies. Israel announced its Pfizer deal one week after Australia but received more doses sooner.
What did Morrison do? He spoke on Thursday as if he was under no obligation to explain. âI would have been talking [to Pfizer] in the second half of last year,â he said, hazily. What effort did he make to secure more than 10 million doses? âEvery effort that we could.â In what way? âIâve answered the question.â
The government offers three main defences to the charge that it failed Australians by taking too long.
The first is Australia could not get more doses. âPfizer proposed to the Australian government the procurement of 10 million doses,â Hunt said on Thursday. In other words, the government took what it could get. âThere were no doses any earlier available for Australia,â he said.
The second is the date of the contract made no difference to the date of delivery. The government says the proof is in Japan: it signed a deal with Pfizer in July last year, five months before Australia, but received its first shipment in February this year, the same month as Australia.
The third is the government was focused on a more important objective: sovereign capacity. Seeing that global supply was volatile, Morrison and Hunt made sure Australia could make its own vaccines. They did this by helping CSL make AstraZeneca doses in Melbourne.
The focus on local manufacturing turned out to be wise when the European Union restricted vaccine exports. Pfizer and others also put a priority on shipments to countries with high coronavirus infection rates, as Morrison argued on Thursday. But the insurance policy was still too small.
In Singapore, for instance, scientists moved quickly to find the most promising vaccine producers. Singapore placed a deposit with Moderna, the other mRNA vaccine producer, in June last year, according to a detailed account in The Straits Times. It was willing to commit to advance purchase agreements that guaranteed early supply if the vaccine turned out to be successful. It was resigned to losing the money if the vaccine failed.
Singapore received its first Pfizer doses a few days before Christmas. A few months later it had a manufacturing deal as well â" something Australia is yet to sign with an mRNA producer.
So it turns out that some countries not only secured more doses sooner than Australia but managed to secure sovereign capacity.Each of the big countries that signed up earlier with Pfizer has a higher vaccination rate than Australia today. This includes Japan.
The new documents do not explain what went wrong in the negotiations. And they only concern Pfizer. It took the government until May this year to sign with Moderna, but those talks remain a mystery. Officials did not seem to want a Moderna deal in January, only to be mugged by reality a few months later.
The ultimate defence for Morrison and Hunt is another measure altogether. Total deaths from the virus in Australia are lower than in any country mentioned here except Singapore. There have been almost 2000 deaths per million people in the United Kingdom compared to 41 in Australia, according to Our World In Data.
But there will have to be an inquiry into every part of the pandemic response. The questions about the vaccine negotiations will not go away. Long after the pandemic, Morrison and Hunt will have to account for the deals they might have done.
David Crowe is chief political correspondent for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.Connect via Twitter or email.
0 Response to "Pfizer deal was an insurance policy we needed but it was too little too late"
Post a Comment